Largely in response to the recent spike in publicized tragedies caused by bullying, the Department of Education today issued guidance on protecting students from various kinds of bullying. The guidance, distributed in the form of a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools, colleges, and universities, clarifies when bullying in schools may violate federal education anti-discrimination laws and reminds educators of their legal obligation to protect students from harassment due to race, national origin, sex, gender, and disability. The letter also gives examples of harassment and describes how a school should address each case.

This response from the Department of Education follows the introduction of a bill addressing bullying in schools, the Safe Schools Improvement Act (SSIA) introduced by Sen. Robert Casey (D-PA) and Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA). NASSP is one of 70 organizations that support the bill as a member of the Safe Schools Partnership and has strongly advocated for its inclusion in an ESEA reauthorization bill. SSIA is a federal anti-bullying bill that includes protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression, and “will require comprehensive anti-bullying policies in our nation’s public schools,” according to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

The impetus for this bill is indisputable: according to a 2005 report from GLSEN and Harris Interactive that surveyed more than 3,000 students, nearly two-thirds of middle and high school students (65%) said they had been bullied in school in the past year. Further, according to GLSEN’s 2007 National School Climate Survey of more than 6,000 LGBT students nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT students (86.4%) said they had been harassed in the past year, and 60.8% said they felt unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation.

Beyond the Department’s letter of guidance released today, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he may urge Congress to introduce legislation specifically to address bullying. To that end, the publication Congressional Quarterly reported that “a key Democrat said he will look at ways to address the issue when Congress takes up the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) next year.” Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, also said the committee would address bullying in future discussions of ESEA reauthorization. Further, members of the House Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Equality Caucus urged the Department of Health and Human Services to focus suicide prevention efforts on the high-risk groups of gay and transgendered youth.

In the coming year, the White House plans to host a conference to “raise awareness and equip young people, parents, educators, coaches and other community leaders with tools to prevent bullying and harassment,” according to a Department of Education press release. “We’ve got to dispel the myth that bullying is just a normal rite of passage, or an inevitable part of growing up. It’s not,” said President Obama. “We have an obligation to ensure that our schools are safe for all of our kids. Every single young person deserves the opportunity to learn and grow and achieve their potential, without having to worry about the constant threat of harassment.”
NASSP will continue to advocate for the Safe Schools Improvement Act (H.R. 2262/S. 3739) and we urge you to write and/or call your members of Congress to cosponsor this bill.

Tagged with:
 

Witnesses and all present members of the House Education and Labor Subcommittee on Healthy Families and Communities unanimously expressed concern for the growing trend in “cyberbullying”. The testimony took place during a subcommittee hearing on June 24 titled “Ensuring Student Cyber Safety”, as part of ongoing discussions of the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).

The term “cyberbullying” refers to any kind of bullying or harassment that takes place on the Internet, through social networking sites like Facebook, and through text messaging. With a Pew 2007 study reporting that 93% of teens aged 12-17 go online daily, 75% have a cell phone, and 73% use social networking sites, the danger of cyberbullying is an increasingly pressing issue.

In her opening remarks, Chairwoman Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) said that according to a February 2010 PEW report, 73% of wired American teens use social networking websites, and that daily text messaging has increased significantly in the past year and a half, from 38% in February 2008 to 54% in September 2009. She stressed that students cannot learn in environments that are unsafe due to cyberbullying from any forms of technology, and that the emotional and physical impacts of cyberbullying are so severe that we must swiftly address this issue. McCarthy concluded by urging strategic coordination between all interested parties, particularly the students.

Barbara-Jane Paris, principal of Canyon Vista Middle School in Austin, TX, and an incoming member of the NASSP board of directors, was the lone school-based witness and provided an invaluable perspective to the hearing of the effects of cyberbullying at school. As a high school principal five years ago, one of her students became suicidal due to cyberbullying, and Paris admits that at the time she felt powerless with no idea of how to address the issue. After much research she discovered Bully Policy USA, a watchdog organization that advocates on behalf of bullied children and reports on state antibullying laws, which provided her with strategies to combat cyberbullying at her school.

Paris also mentioned the research that came out of a report entitled The Principal’s Perspective: School Safety, Bullying, and Harassment that the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) published with NASSP’s collaboration in 2008. A survey from this report found that 49% of public school principals considered bullying, name calling, or harassment of students to be a serious problem at their school. Furthermore, 72% of principals estimated that students at their school engage in cyberbullying to some extent.

Two themes central to effectively addressing cyberbullying emerged during the hearing: awareness and collaboration. To raise awareness, renowned talk-show host Dr. Phil urged that parents close the “information gap” and learn more about their children’s use of the Internet and social networking sites in order to understand how to prevent cyberbullying. In response, Paris mentioned that she regularly holds “parent summits” at her school to educate parents on Internet safety issues, among other things. She also advocated that educators receive comprehensive professional development on how to ensure student safety while using technology as an educational tool. Dominique Napolitano, a rising high school senior and member of Girl Scouts’ Let Me Know program, which shares current issues facing teen girls online and tools to keep them safer online, noted that teenagers also need to become more aware of the harmful effects of cyberbullying as a prevention strategy since many do not fully realize the grave impact of this kind of bullying. Parry Aftab, a privacy lawyer and expert on cybercrime, announced that she is releasing a “Stop Cyberbullying” toolkit for parents and children this September that will be free and available for schools as a useful awareness tool.

Similarly, most witnesses noted collaboration among parents, students, educators, social and religious institutions, and the federal government as an essential component of cyberbullying prevention. Paris stressed that she and other school administrators cannot effectively ensure student cyber safety without the support of the federal government. Aftab and Dr. Phil urged parents to have an ongoing dialogue with their children about their Internet use and strategies to prevent either being the victim of cyberbullying or the actual perpetrator.

As a member of the National Safe Schools Partnership, NASSP has promoted federal policy recommendations to prevent bullying and harassment in our nation’s schools, which are embodied in the Safe Schools Improvement Act (H.R. 2262) and will hopefully be incorporated into a reauthorized ESEA. These recommendations propose that:

  1. Schools and districts have comprehensive and effective student conduct policies that include clear prohibitions regarding bullying and harassment
  2. Schools and districts focus on effective prevention strategies and professional development to assist school personnel address issues associated with bullying and harassment
  3. States and districts maintain and report data regarding incidents of bullying and harassment to inform the development of effective federal, state, and local policies that address these issues.

To view an archived webcast of the hearing, visit the NASSP homepage at www.nassp.org.

New legislation introduced by Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) and 60 original cosponsors would extend civil rights protections to public school students who are, or are perceived to be, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT). Upon its introduction in late January, the Student Non-Discrimination Act (H.R. 4530) or “SNDA” was celebrated by civil rights and education groups alike.

SNDA would establish a federal prohibition on discrimination in public schools that is based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. It would also provide victims of such harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence with more effective legal recourse in federal courts. “Every student has the right to an education free from harassment and violence,” said Polis, a former chairman of the Colorado State Board of Education and current member of the House Education and Labor Committee. In a press release, Polis contended that his legislation “puts LGBT students on an equal footing with their peers, so they can attend school and get a quality education, free from fear.”

Current federal statutes specifically prohibit discrimination in public schools on the basis of race, color, gender, religion, disability or national origin, but sexual orientation and gender identity have not been expressly addressed until now. SNDA would extend protections to LGBT students based on those found in Title IX, which deals with gender discrimination. That would make adherence to the new protections a requirement for the delivery of federal funds and grants. Additionally, targeted LGBT students and their families would be able to assert a violation of the law when seeking remedies against discrimination in court.

Surveys indicate that as many as nine out of ten LGBT students have been the victims of bullying or harassment based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, and that a majority of these students feel unsafe at school as a result. Repeated discriminatory treatment has been linked to high rates of absenteeism, disengagement, and academic underachievement among LGBT students. For some students, there are even more serious consequences. As stated in a letter signed by Polis and other proponents of the legislation, “left unchecked, discrimination can lead, and has led, to life-threatening violence and to suicide.”

“A safe and secure learning environment is vital to the educational success of all students,” said NASSP Executive Director Gerald N. Tirozzi. “This legislation will enhance the ability of teachers and administrators to deliver a valuable education in public schools that are free of bullying, harassment and other forms of harmful discrimination.”

 

Tagged with:
 

Comment on the poll.

A recent issue if U.S. News and World Report spotlights two high schools, one in Milwaukee and one in New York City, that are havens for gay students and other students prone to bullying. Despite the improved graduation rates and grades enjoyed by the students in both schools, some critics argue that such schools are just another form of segregation, masking the real problem instead of solving it. Plans for another gay school, slated to open in Chicago, have stalled among skepticism.

While schools strive to be safe havens for all students, some school leaders acknowledge that gay students remain casualties in the fight against bullying. So, principals, are “gay-friendly” schools the answer to keeping these students safe? If you have not already done so, please take this week’s Principal’s Poll at www.nassp.org and leave your comments below.

Tagged with:
 

Would anonymous tiplines reduce the incidence of bullying in schools?
(Final results)

57% Yes
43% No

Total Votes: 163

———————————————

MSNBC recently reported on the availability of a new tipline by which students can anonymously report threats and incidents of bullying in their schools. The Web site at SchoolTipline forwards the anonymous tip to the school and sends a reminder to the school official if the tip has gone unread after a day or so.

Principals in middle and high schools regularly confront issues of bullying in school. So where does an anonymous tipline fit among the arsenal of antibullying resources available to schools? Can they help make a difference? Please take this week’s Principal’s Poll at www.nassp.org and leave your comments on the topic below. (Poll is not closed.)

Tagged with:
 

House Passes Bill to Improve School Safety

On September 26, 2008, in School Safety, by Mary Kingston

On September 17 the House of Representatives passed a bill that would allow more funds to flow to low-income schools to improve school safety.

The School Safety Enhancements Act (H.R. 2352) would allow more low-income schools to participate in the Secure Our Schools (SOS) program by lowering the local matching grant requirement to 20%, and increasing the federal share to a maximum of 80%. The bill would also authorize $50 million annually for SOS grants. In addition, the bill would add to the list of allowable uses of grant funds by including a hotline for students and others to report dangerous incidents. Currently funds may be used to help schools pay for metal detectors, lighting, locks, security assessments, training for administrators, students, and teachers, coordination with law enforcement, and other measures designed to improve school safety.

For more information and to apply for SOS grants, visit http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?Item=240.

“Whether it is fighting terrorism or working to keep our schools free of violence, I have always believed that the government’s first responsibility is to protect the people. Our government must help to ensure that our children are safe and protected from violence of any kind in school. I am proud to report that this Congress has taken another step to ensure a safe learning environment for our children by passing my School Safety Enhancements Act,” said Rep. Steven Rothman (D-NJ), the bill’s sponsor.

The bill now goes to the Senate where it awaits consideration. Information on when the bill might be voted on is not yet available.

Interested in school safety issues? Visit www.nassp.org/safety for a host of resources on school climate, crisis prevention and management, harassment and bullying prevention, and substance and drug abuse prevention.

Tagged with:
 

Congress Moves to Hike School Safety Funding

On June 16, 2008, in School Safety, by Mary Kingston

On June 11 the House Judiciary Committee approved a bill that would allow more funds to flow to low-income schools to improve school safety.

The School Safety Enhancements Act of 2007 (H.R. 2352) would allow more low-income schools to participate in the Secure Our Schools (SOS) program by lowering the local matching grant requirement to 20%, and increasing the federal share to a maximum of 80%. The bill would also authorize $50 million annually for SOS grants. In addition, the bill would add to the list of allowable uses of grant funds by including a hotline for students and others to report dangerous incidents. Currently funds may be used to help schools pay for metal detectors, lighting, locks, security assessments, training for administrators, students, and teachers, coordination with law enforcement, and other measures designed to improve school safety.

The bill now goes to the House floor for consideration. Information on when the bill might be considered is not yet available. There is a companion bill in the Senate, S. 1217, however no action has occurred on this bill since its introduction in 2007.

Interested in school safety issues? Visit www.nassp.org/safety for a host of resources on school climate, crisis prevention and management, harassment and bullying prevention, and substance and drug abuse prevention.

Tagged with:
 

Senate Passes Internet Safety Bill

On May 27, 2008, in School Safety, by Mary Kingston

On May 22, the Senate passed the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act (S. 1965). As previously reported on the Principal’s Policy Blog, the bill would:

  • Require schools receiving E-Rate funds to teach students about Internet safety and the dangers posed by social networking Web sites and chat rooms, and provide information on cyberbullying awareness and response;
    • This bill would not require schools to block access to social networking Web sites and chat rooms as a precondition of receiving E-Rate funds;
  • Direct the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), in collaboration with nonprofits, state and local governments, private technology companies, and Internet service providers, to conduct a public awareness campaign on strategies to promote the safe use of the Internet by children;
    • Require the FTC to submit an annual report to Congress on its promotion of Internet safety;
  • Establish an Online Safety and Technology working group at the U.S. Commerce Department to review and evaluate industry efforts to promote online safety through parental control technology and blocking and filtering software. The working group will include representatives from the business community, public interest groups, and federal agencies.
  • Require Internet service providers to report child pornography and significantly increases fines for failing to do so.

In a press release following passage of S. 1965, the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), said “Keeping children safe on the Internet must be a multi-layered approach to safety, both on and offline…The Internet is a valuable resource for children and this measure improves safety and addresses parental control without infringing on the First Amendment.”

The House of Representatives must approve an identical version of the bill before it goes to the president for his signature or veto. We’ll keep you updated as developments occur, so check back often!

Although NASSP has not taken a position on the bill, we have developed a position statement on Internet safety that provides guidance and recommendations for school leaders to assist them in their efforts to protect students while preparing them for the technologies they will encounter. To view this statement, please visit www.nassp.org.

Comment on the poll.

According to a Baltimore Sun article, 60% of teachers in one Maryland district report having been harassed or bullied by parents. Perhaps some of this harassment is a misunderstanding–e-mail communication, after all, is quick and doesn’t convey tone very well. But when the harassing takes place in person, there’s little disputing it.

Is the problem isolated to this one Maryland district or is it the experience of teachers all over the country? Take this week’s Principal’s Poll at www.nassp.org and leave your comments below.

Tagged with:
 

Should educators pursue litigation for cyberbullying and online pranks?
Final results

72% Yes, students need to know it’s a serious offense
17% Yes, only when there’s no school-based recourse
4% No, litigation won’t let the school heal
1% No, such activities rarely cause real harm
6% No, it’s a school matter only

Total Votes: 189

————————————–

It’s now trite to say that cyberbulling and online harassment are huge issues for administrators, and as ed law professor Scott McLeod pointed out in his session at the 2008 NASSP Convention this past weekend, the courts have not been particularly friendly to administrators who have taken action to curtail such activities. (Click here to see Scott’s PowerPoint, handout, and other guidance.)

Yet, as a recent Christian Science Monitor article explains, while school leaders’ hands are often tied to treat cyberbullying as a school matter, more and more educators are pursuing private litigation or criminal charges to strike back against online pranksters.

This poll is now closed, but we invite you to leave your comments on the results below.

Tagged with:
 

Switch to our mobile site